New@SBA.
ONCA Upholds Video Voyeur Verdict
The recent decision by the Court of Appeal in clarifies the developing concept of individuals’ privacy rights. The appellant was in a long distance romantic relationship with the complainant. During their relationship, the parties engaged in an...
An Era of Conscious Data Use – And Facebook’s Lack Thereof
After implementing stricter privacy laws in 2018, Canada has joined a number of countries with a shifting mentality regarding privacy rights. Individuals are becoming more aware of the information they are disclosing. Users of applications and...
Walking a Fine Line – Bill of Lading Stomps Liability for Cargo Theft
The Federal Court recently released the decision of Black & White Merchandising Co. Ltd. v. Deltrans International Shipping Corporation. The case involved the transportation and theft of over 8000 pairs of children's shoes. While the decision is...
No Skirting of Responsibility
While at the Bramalea City Centre Mall with her mom and siblings, the plaintiff (a minor) fell backwards on an upward moving escalator. Unfortunately, her left hand got stuck in the step-to-skirt gap of the escalator resulting in a severing of her...
Too Good to be True? May be your Wilful Blindness
The Facts This sordid tale begins with an employee going rogue with a company credit card. The Defendant Fung began purchasing iPhones and iPads from the Defendant Minetto in November 2011. The first transaction was seemingly innocent. The two met...
When is Your Mom Your Landlord?
The recent decision of Traders General Insurance Company v. Elizabeth Gibson asked the question, “Am I my [mother]’s keeper?” in the context of coverage for third party bodily injury claims under a homeowner policy. In this case, the answer was...
Surprise, surprise, surprise!
In a very surprising turn of events, the long awaited judicial review of MVAC v. Barnes, P16-00087 FSCO was dismissed as moot when it was revealed that the outcome of the judicial review would have no effect on either of the parties appearing...
Mann v Jeffersen: No Objective Injury? You Better be Credible!
This decision arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on February 8, 2011. The trial took place in January 2019 before Trimble J. After the jury retired to deliberate, the defendants brought a motion for a declaration that the...
Court confirms the “But For” test applies to the SABS
A recent decision of the Divisional Court has confirmed that the ‘but for’ test was the correct causation test to be applied in accident benefit cases. In Sabadash v. State Farm et al, prior to the subject accident in March 2011, Mr. Sabadash had a...
Playing With Fire – Constructive Dismissal and Mitigation
In what can only be described as a Pyrrhic victory, a recent Ontario Superior Court summary judgment decision highlights the employment risks present in temporary lay-offs during a business downtown. This decision is a strong reminder that lay-offs are not an automatic contractual right and can trigger a constructive dismissal claim. This decision also confirms that employees must take offers of re-employment seriously when alleging constructive dismissal.
Say it if you mean it
UPDATE: This decision has since been overturned on appeal. Mr. Demetriou claimed he was robbed of a $550,000.00 ring (a family heirloom) that he was wearing on a gold chain around his neck while walking alone on a beach in Punta Cana. He had added...
Causation: More Than a Bump in the Road
The Plaintiff suffered injuries after tripping on a speed bump in a parking lot owned by the Defendant. While the parties agreed to damages, the matter proceeded to trial on the issue of liability. The Court considered whether the Defendant...